Tuesday, September 30, 2003

LIBERAL HYPOCRISY, PART 79

From Rooters, concerning the Plame gag:

"Another Democratic candidate, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean (news - web sites), called for a thorough investigation free from political pressure."

How could he keep a straight face when he said that is beyond me. A democrat candidate for president and vociferous Bush-hater demands an investigation "free from political pressure". I'm sure he'll be setting an example by not exploiting this media-feuled charade for political gain, too.

"Candidate Joseph Lieberman, a senator from Connecticut, urged the White House to maintain all phone logs, e-mails, correspondence 'and anything else that may relate to these events, and make clear that anyone destroying or otherwise tampering with these records will be fired.'"

Sure. We'll let Al Gore handle the e-mails and Hillary Clinton can safekeep any paperwork or other records.

Liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Monday, September 29, 2003

Terrorists Vote Democrat

If you were a terrorist, who would you vote for? Someone who responds to terrorist attacks by immediately bombing the shit out of your homeland, or someone who thinks the best way to combat terrorism is to have the UN draft pointless resolutions for 12 years? If you were planning on killing a few thousand innocent Americans, who would you rather have in the White House - Ronald Reagan or Jimmy Carter? George H. Bush or Bill Clinton? George W. Bush or Hillary? The fact is, Democrats can't be trusted to lead a war on terror because their first instinct is to blame America for terrorist attacks against American citizens, and then beg France for permission to fight back. Bill Clinton should have flattened Afghanistan after the USS Cole bombing. When the bodies of U.S. troops were dragged through the streets of Mogadishu, he should have responded with an iron fist instead of a limp wrist. After 8 years of his non-responses to terrorist attacks on American citizens, is it any wonder that Bin Laden thought he could get away with 9/11?
Now we have a field of democrat candidates who are not demanding a stronger fight against terrorism, but a weaker one. Their big complaint isn't that Bush's strategy is ineffective - but that he didn't get France's seal of approval first. Liberals often have to preface their anti-Bush rants with "Don't get me wrong, Saddam Hussein was an evil man, buuuuuttttt...". Why must they constantly remind people that they aren't on Saddam's side before stating their position?
Bush's campaign slogan should be "Bush; despised by terrorists and liberals everywhere". And to top it off, the French dislike him.
He has my vote.

Tuesday, September 23, 2003

Kofi Assinine

Am I the only one who wonders why Grady from Sanford and Son thinks we must report to him and get his permission before we engage in a military action? I suppose we should let Lamont weigh in as well.

Friday, September 19, 2003

"Iraq still has prescribed weapons capability.There needs to be a careful distinction here. Iraq today is challenging the special commission to come up with a weapon and say where is the weapon in Iraq, and yet part of their efforts to conceal their capabilities, I believe, have been to disassemble weapons into various components and to hide these components throughout Iraq. I think the danger right now is that without effective inspections, without effective monitoring, Iraq can in a very short period of time measure the months, reconstitute chemical biological weapons, long-range ballistic missiles to deliver these weapons, and even certain aspects of their nuclear weaponization program." - Scott Ritter on Jim Lehrer News Hour, August 31, 1998


Wednesday, September 17, 2003

Jaguar: Is it "Jag-Wahr" or "Jag-you-ar"? I've always said "Jag-wahr", but now that they're saying "Jag-you-ar" in all the Jaguar TV spots, everyone's saying "Jag-you-ar". I'm upgrading my Mac OS to OS Jaguar and half the people I talk to are already saying "Jag-you-ar", and I know it's because of those damn car commercials. Shit like that drives me nuts, and I know the ad execs do it on purpose. If you change the pronunciation of your brand name, people are suddenly talking about it, correcting each other in conversation, and the brand name becomes burned in their brains. That's how "Porshe" became "Por-shuh" and "Nike" became "Nikey". I guess that once everyone gets use to "Jag-you-ar", they'll start doing "Jay-Goo-RAH" commercials.

Monday, September 15, 2003

Let's see what Bab's is up to...

Oh look - she wrote one on Freedom of Speech! It seems that poor Babs has been silenced by the fascist right-wingers, who won't let her express her opinions. That must be why I haven't heard hide nor hair of Babs in almost three minutes.

"It used to be in politics that there was a certain amount of class and eloquence. The debate was civilized even though there were strong disagreements over deeply important questions. But, as usual, the Republicans have resorted to name-calling and mean-spiritedness. It's interesting how the actors that are criticized for their political activism always happen to be Democrats... The press does not criticize Republican actors Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Charlton Heston for expressing their strongly-held political opinions."

Oh yes, the Press has always been very supportive and non-critical of Ronald Reagan, Chuck Heston, and Arnold. And left never spoke unfavorably of any of them, or resorted to name calling and mean-spiritedness. No siree.

Does this broad live in a fucking cave?

Of the thousands of stupid things liberals say, one of the most hilarious is their insistance we no longer have freedom of speech. They base this on the fact that since 9/11, they've found it harder to make idiotic, anti-American statements without being called idiotic and anti-American. When the Dixie Chicks badmouthed the president and angry Americans organized to boycott their albums, liberals screamed that their first amendment rights were being violated. When Dr. Laura voiced disapproval of the homosexual lifestyle on her radio program, pissy liberals organized to boycott her sponsors - but that's NOT infringing on her first amendment rights, is it? When Trent Lott said something nice to Strom Thurmond at his 175th birthday party, they wanted Lott roasted on a spit. He was forced to resign his position as senate majority leader , but the Dixie Chicks are back at the top of the charts, performing to sell-out crowds, and making assinine, unamerican comments again. Yet, it was the Dixie Chicks who suffered so horribly at the hands of the evil right-wing jingo-fascists like myself.

Poor Dixie Chicks. Poor liberals.

That's why I bust up laughing whenever the left cries about the US PATRIOT act, and their precious Freedom of Speech being violated. News for ya - if there was no Freedom of Speech like you claim, you wouldn't have the right to complain about it! Fucking morons.

Friday, September 12, 2003

I was a highwayman. Along the coach roads I did ride
With sword and pistol by my side
Many a young maid lost her baubles to my trade
Many a soldier shed his lifeblood on my blade
The bastards hung me in the spring of twenty-five
But I am still alive.

I was a sailor. I was born upon the tide
And with the sea I did abide.
I sailed a schooner round the Horn to Mexico
I went aloft and furled the mainsail in a blow
And when the yards broke off they said that I got killed
But I am living still.

I was a dam builder across the river deep and wide
Where steel and water did collide
A place called Boulder on the wild Colorado
I slipped and fell into the wet concrete below
They buried me in that great tomb that knows no sound
But I am still around..I'll always be around..and around and around and
around and around

I fly a starship across the Universe divide
And when I reach the other side
I'll find a place to rest my spirit if I can
Perhaps I may become a highwayman again
Or I may simply be a single drop of rain
But I will remain
And I'll be back again, and again and again and again and again..


So long J.C..

Thursday, September 11, 2003

Please, enough with the 9/11 weepiness. Am I the only one who is not weeping? The only people who have a right to weep openly today are family members of the victims. The rest of you pussies can have your little group hugs and pretentious tearfests - I choose this day to be totally fucking angry, and to wish a painful, screaming death upon the worthless animals responsible. While many of you wallow in self-pity and masturbatory introspection, I'm praying that somewhere, our troops will be greasing their tank treads with Habib and frying up a little Achmed Ala Napalm this fine evening. Oh, spare me the blubbering hate mail. These people want to die, don't they? Our guys are doing them a favor.

That's another thing - why do the Palestinians get so upset whenever the Israeli's fire a couple of rockets into their terrorist hangouts? So a couple of Hamas goons got snuffed - the very same assholes would be blowing themselves up in a Jewish deli tomorrow anyway. But I guess they don't get the virgins unless they kill a bunch of innocents on their way out. And yet, Howard Dean can't decide who the bad guy in the fight is.

I have come to the conclusion that the Democrat Party has gone completely fucking insane. No more is their dementia restricted to the extreme left of the party - the probable democrat presidential nominee, Howard Dean, is so fucking shit nuts that he scares the crap out of me. We're in the middle of a war in which civilization itself is under attack from radical Islamists that dream of bathing in the blood of Americans, and he wants to scrap our military and surrender our foreign policy to the same people who were sucking Hitler's dick in WW2.

Then there's John Kerry, who is a Vietnam veteran, and yet somehow a complete pussy. His handlers decided that the solution to his reputation for being "unfeeling" is to have him start crying on cue. Now instead of being "aloof", he's soggier than Robert Byrd's Depends. The poor guy cries like a broad watching soaps. Would Harry Truman every cry for votes? Did JFK ever cry on the campaign trail? In there a single man left in the entire democrat party? That is, one that doesn't have to take man lessons to learn how to be a man.

And the menagerie of lunatics goes on. We have Dick Gephardt, who says he'll sign executive orders to rescind any supreme court decisions he doesn't like. Kinda like Saddam, only without the charisma.

And now in comes Wesley Clark, whose own website reads like the ramblings of a deranged mental patient. " I thought this country was founded on a principle of progressive taxation," he says in criticism of our tax cuts. Yeah, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, Madison, et. al. all got together one night over a couple of beers and decided to declare independence from Great Britian because they simply weren't taxing us enough.

There's not a rational, reasonable candidate among any of the democrat hopefuls. Even Holy Joe Lieberman, with his occasional moments of mental clarity, has joined the "Hate Bush above all else" crowd. Gloom and doom. There isn't an FDR or a JFK among them - their entire message is that we're all living in Hell on Earth and we're going to die horrible screaming deaths unless we hand them the keys to the country. Doesn't anyone have any postive, constructive ideas on the left anymore? Do they have any better ideas for fighting terrorism, besides "surrender the reigns to France"? That's the real sign that the democrats have gone insane - they want us to turn over the war on terrorism to France. Nevermind that France's answer to tyranny and agression is to arm and appease the agressor. We must have France's approval on everything! They talk in cool accents and hate Disney, so they must be right!

Friday, September 05, 2003